|
The vision of a worldwide computing grid evokes the scenario of
electronic markets for grid services. For such a market, explicit formal statements of
both obligations and guarantees regarding grid services in a business relationship are
needed; these are referred to as service level agreements (SLAs). The objects of our
investigation are current specifications and standards for SLAs. We address the
problem that these approaches do not sufficiently fulfil requirements of business
transactions, because they have been designed for other, technical objectives. We
evaluate the most relevant SLA specifications and standards from an e-business
transaction perspective, clarifying how they currently cover business transactions on
e-markets, in particular which activities within market transactions they support. We
assess the current state of SLA approaches and reveal room for possible
enhancements.
Implementing and using Grids requires a suitable Grid middleware. A ref-
erence model for the architecture of Grid middleware is the Open Grid Service Ar-
chitecture (OGSA) which proposes a service-oriented architecture based on Web ser-
vice technologies. As a consequence, the potential of such OGSA compliant Grid
middleware is limited by the capabilities of Web service technologies. Recently,
multiagent concepts and technologies have been proposed to overcoming these limi-
tations. While this suggestion was widely accepted by both the multiagent and Grid
community and has already resulted in a wide spectrum of respective research and
development, there is still no comprehensive decision support available on how and
where to use multiagent technology in OGSA compliant Grid middleware. The engi-
neering of Grid middleware could benefit from such a support. Therefore, this paper
aims at a first attempt towards a framework to support the engineering of OGSA
compliant Grid middleware using multiagent technology.
Despite promising high value for electronic business, Service Level
Agreements have not yet found major uptake in the business world. A major obstacle
to adoption is the lack of adequate tools that facilitate and automate SLA
establishment on both the consumer as well as the provider side. In this paper, we
describe a generic framework for negotiating SLAs that has been designed and
implemented by the authors. The components automate large parts of the negotiation
process while at the same time letting the user retain control. An application scenario
has been realised using our framework showing that the negotiation and
establishment of SLAs is a viable solution for electronic contracting and that our
framework can facilitate this task.
Modern day approaches towards realising Service Level Agreement
(SLA) specifications generally disrespect essential privacy and confidentiality issues,
in particular with respect to exposing information about the infrastructure and how
quality related data is gathered and processed. Such information is neither helpful for
the customer, nor does it agree with most providers’ confidentiality policies. This
paper will present a hierarchical approach towards modelling SLAs that would allow
any degree of confidentiality & privacy meeting both customer’s and provider’s
requirements. It would also allow the provider to easily reuse the SLA for different
infrastructure setups. Such an approach will make it possible to close the gap
between SLA capabilities and the requirements of (electronic) contracts.
This position paper argues for research in the development of
focused solutions for dynamic pricing, service-level agreements
and negotiation for eServices in a digital economy. Thereby the
authors have a main focus on the development of an independent
negotiation protocol, which satisfies the needs and preferences of
customers and service providers, also with a certain focus on legal
aspects of such a protocol. Another point of interest is hereby to
examine what properties dynamic pricing components in a service
oriented architecture should have and which benefits can be
reached by following such approaches. We see that the
provisioning of dynamic pricing components will surely affect the
negotiation behavior of service providers and customers in a way
that eBusiness will get stronger.
Collaborative Engineering tasks are difficult to manage and involve a high amount of risk – as such, these tasks generally involve only well-known pre-established relationships. Such collaborations are generally quite static and do not allow for dynamic reactions to changes in the environment. Furthermore, not all optimal resource providers can be utilised for the respective tasks as they are potentially unknown. The TrustCoM project elaborated the means to create and manage Virtual Organisations in a trusted and secure manner integrating different providers on demand. However, TrustCoM focused more on the VO than on the participant, whereas the BREIN project is now enhancing the intelligence of such VO systems to support even providers with little business expertise and provide them with capabilities to optimise their performance. This paper analyses the capabilities of current VO frameworks on the example of TrustCoM and identifies the gaps from the participant’s perspective. It then shows how BREIN addresses these gaps.
|